Ethics and Accountability on the
U.S. Supreme Court is
an original research monograph that provides a comprehensive examination of the
causes and consequences of recusal behavior on the U.S. Supreme Court. I explore the conditions under which recusals
occur, as well as the impact of recusals on case outcomes, the scope of majority
opinions, the likelihood of certiorari grants, and public attitudes about the
Court. I trace the evolution of media
commentary about recusals, showing how popular discourse about recusals has
become politicized and is inflaming demands for reform. I also provide readers with a rich historical
overview of the Court’s recusal practices and describe and evaluate proposals
for reforming the process. My key
finding is that the justices do not strictly follow the recusal guidelines set
by Congress, but neither do they ignore these guidelines. Instead, the justices are strategic in their
compliance with ethical rules, balancing Congressional guidelines against other
institutional and policy goals.
No comments:
Post a Comment